<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the claim of incentive commission was genuine, supported by evidence from recipients and the nature of the commission transactions. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the enhancement of penalty by the CIT(A) without issuing a show-cause notice as lacking jurisdiction and vacated the directions to levy further penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the claim of incentive commission was genuine, supported by evidence from recipients and the nature of the commission transactions. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the enhancement of penalty by the CIT(A) without issuing a show-cause notice as lacking jurisdiction and vacated the directions to levy further penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>