<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 104 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed seven appeals filed by the assessees, granting relief on various grounds. It criticized the conduct of the Departmental Representative for requesting adjournments and misrepresenting facts. The Tribunal addressed issues like double additions in firms&#039; cases, allocation of excess stock, unexplained assets, household expenses, and unaccounted investments. It deleted unjustified additions for silver utensils and unexplained cash. Additionally, it dismissed the issue of unaccounted investments in shops and denied capital gains in a specific case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessees on multiple points while rejecting others, directing the order&#039;s copies to relevant authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 104 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed seven appeals filed by the assessees, granting relief on various grounds. It criticized the conduct of the Departmental Representative for requesting adjournments and misrepresenting facts. The Tribunal addressed issues like double additions in firms&#039; cases, allocation of excess stock, unexplained assets, household expenses, and unaccounted investments. It deleted unjustified additions for silver utensils and unexplained cash. Additionally, it dismissed the issue of unaccounted investments in shops and denied capital gains in a specific case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessees on multiple points while rejecting others, directing the order&#039;s copies to relevant authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>