<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 310 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55333</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order canceling a penalty of Rs. 4,95,410 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that the penalty could not be levied in the absence of a filed return, as concealment of income could only be assessed against a return. The majority view emphasized that the main provision of Section 271(1)(c) did not apply without a filed return, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 310 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55333</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order canceling a penalty of Rs. 4,95,410 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that the penalty could not be levied in the absence of a filed return, as concealment of income could only be assessed against a return. The majority view emphasized that the main provision of Section 271(1)(c) did not apply without a filed return, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>