<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 9.77 lakhs as undisclosed income for admitted unaccounted cash received from parties. However, the Tribunal deleted the additions for under-invoicing of machinery and unaccounted purchase of materials due to lack of specific evidence, reduced the addition for unaccounted sale of machineries, and allowed telescoping for unaccounted credits. The Tribunal also reduced the addition for unaccounted scrap sales and deleted the addition for forfeited advance money, which was properly recorded. The Third Member upheld the deletion of additions for under-invoicing of machinery after disagreement with the Judicial Member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 9.77 lakhs as undisclosed income for admitted unaccounted cash received from parties. However, the Tribunal deleted the additions for under-invoicing of machinery and unaccounted purchase of materials due to lack of specific evidence, reduced the addition for unaccounted sale of machineries, and allowed telescoping for unaccounted credits. The Tribunal also reduced the addition for unaccounted scrap sales and deleted the addition for forfeited advance money, which was properly recorded. The Third Member upheld the deletion of additions for under-invoicing of machinery after disagreement with the Judicial Member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>