<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 248 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, sustaining the addition of Rs. 4,35,263 due to stock discrepancies as the assessee failed to disprove them. However, it upheld the deletion of the Rs. 2,90,700 addition related to alleged sale of PVC resin outside the books, finding the AO&#039;s findings unsupported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 248 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, sustaining the addition of Rs. 4,35,263 due to stock discrepancies as the assessee failed to disprove them. However, it upheld the deletion of the Rs. 2,90,700 addition related to alleged sale of PVC resin outside the books, finding the AO&#039;s findings unsupported.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>