<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the conditions of section 10(6)(vii)(a) were met, there was no violation regarding the payment of bonus, and the contract of service was approved in time. The reassessment orders for both years were quashed, and the original assessment orders were restored. The appeal by the department was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the conditions of section 10(6)(vii)(a) were met, there was no violation regarding the payment of bonus, and the contract of service was approved in time. The reassessment orders for both years were quashed, and the original assessment orders were restored. The appeal by the department was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>