<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 84 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deeming the addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act unjustified. It emphasized the necessity for conclusive evidence before invoking such provisions, highlighting that payments to contractors, even if considered unexplained expenditure, should be deductible while computing business profits. The Tribunal modified the Commissioner (Appeals) order, directing the Income Tax Officer to act in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 84 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deeming the addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act unjustified. It emphasized the necessity for conclusive evidence before invoking such provisions, highlighting that payments to contractors, even if considered unexplained expenditure, should be deductible while computing business profits. The Tribunal modified the Commissioner (Appeals) order, directing the Income Tax Officer to act in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>