<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revisional order of the CIT under section 263, finding the AO&#039;s failure to conduct proper inquiries resulted in an erroneous assessment prejudicial to revenue. Regarding the liability for damages, the Tribunal held that it did not accrue in the relevant assessment year as the arbitration award was disputed and not finalized. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revisional order of the CIT under section 263, finding the AO&#039;s failure to conduct proper inquiries resulted in an erroneous assessment prejudicial to revenue. Regarding the liability for damages, the Tribunal held that it did not accrue in the relevant assessment year as the arbitration award was disputed and not finalized. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>