<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the AO to allow depreciation on assets leased to RSEB, amounting to Rs. 1,23,85,750. The disallowance under section 43B on deferred sales tax was deleted. However, the addition of lease rent was upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The disallowance of garden maintenance expenses was also overturned by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the AO to allow depreciation on assets leased to RSEB, amounting to Rs. 1,23,85,750. The disallowance under section 43B on deferred sales tax was deleted. However, the addition of lease rent was upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The disallowance of garden maintenance expenses was also overturned by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>