<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the under-valuation of closing stock and the inclusion of Excise Duty in turnover. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) on these issues. However, the disallowance of Foreign Travel expenses was upheld by the Tribunal based on the capital nature of the expenditure for acquiring fixed assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the under-valuation of closing stock and the inclusion of Excise Duty in turnover. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) on these issues. However, the disallowance of Foreign Travel expenses was upheld by the Tribunal based on the capital nature of the expenditure for acquiring fixed assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>