<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transaction did not constitute a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the provisions of Section 45(2) and Section 45(3) were not applicable, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and no tax on capital gains being levied for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transaction did not constitute a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. It was found that the provisions of Section 45(2) and Section 45(3) were not applicable, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and no tax on capital gains being levied for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>