<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 71 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55184</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for investment allowance on a road roller used in road construction, emphasizing the composite nature of construction activities and the distinct end-product of road construction. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to examine if the road roller was part of a composite activity alongside other machinery. The decision highlighted the eligibility for investment allowance in road construction and the need for a comprehensive assessment by the ITO. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the ITO for further evaluation of the investment allowance eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 71 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55184</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for investment allowance on a road roller used in road construction, emphasizing the composite nature of construction activities and the distinct end-product of road construction. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to examine if the road roller was part of a composite activity alongside other machinery. The decision highlighted the eligibility for investment allowance in road construction and the need for a comprehensive assessment by the ITO. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the ITO for further evaluation of the investment allowance eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>