<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 218 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit legitimate deductions for expenses, except for disallowances of miscellaneous and traveling expenses due to insufficient details provided by the assessee. The disallowance of payment to photo vision, amount paid for the purchase of a wall clock, and interest expenditure claimed by the assessee were allowed after considering the business purposes and supporting documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 218 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit legitimate deductions for expenses, except for disallowances of miscellaneous and traveling expenses due to insufficient details provided by the assessee. The disallowance of payment to photo vision, amount paid for the purchase of a wall clock, and interest expenditure claimed by the assessee were allowed after considering the business purposes and supporting documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>