<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 286 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A) orders and restoring the matters to the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. It emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, ruling that defects due to non-compliance with s. 249(4) are curable, and non-availability of funds constitutes a reasonable cause for delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 286 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A) orders and restoring the matters to the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. It emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, ruling that defects due to non-compliance with s. 249(4) are curable, and non-availability of funds constitutes a reasonable cause for delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>