<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 284 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that penalties under s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed when the assessed income is a loss, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in Prithipal Singh &amp; Co. Amendments by the Finance Act, 2002, were deemed non-retrospective. Consequently, the penalties were annulled, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessees&#039; appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 284 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that penalties under s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed when the assessed income is a loss, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in Prithipal Singh &amp; Co. Amendments by the Finance Act, 2002, were deemed non-retrospective. Consequently, the penalties were annulled, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessees&#039; appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>