<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC regarding the assessment under section 143(1) of the IT Act and the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217. The Tribunal ruled that the assessee&#039;s late filing of the return was not justified by claiming benefits under the Amnesty Scheme, emphasizing that the scheme did not apply to the interest imposed. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of demand, stating that no apparent mistakes were found in the assessment order and interest charged, and relief could not be granted due to the assessee&#039;s failure to object within the prescribed timeframe under section 143(2)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC regarding the assessment under section 143(1) of the IT Act and the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217. The Tribunal ruled that the assessee&#039;s late filing of the return was not justified by claiming benefits under the Amnesty Scheme, emphasizing that the scheme did not apply to the interest imposed. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of demand, stating that no apparent mistakes were found in the assessment order and interest charged, and relief could not be granted due to the assessee&#039;s failure to object within the prescribed timeframe under section 143(2)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>