<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 39 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revisional order under section 263, reinstating the ITO&#039;s order that accepted the genuineness of the cash credits. The Tribunal found that the ITO had made efforts to investigate the credits, including obtaining statements and affidavits. Despite some inquiries not being conducted as suggested by the Commissioner, the Tribunal deemed the revisional action unnecessary due to time lapse, evidentiary challenges, and lack of fault on the assessee&#039;s part. The discretionary nature of revisional powers was emphasized, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 39 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revisional order under section 263, reinstating the ITO&#039;s order that accepted the genuineness of the cash credits. The Tribunal found that the ITO had made efforts to investigate the credits, including obtaining statements and affidavits. Despite some inquiries not being conducted as suggested by the Commissioner, the Tribunal deemed the revisional action unnecessary due to time lapse, evidentiary challenges, and lack of fault on the assessee&#039;s part. The discretionary nature of revisional powers was emphasized, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>