https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55019 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions of various additions made by the AO, including those related to unproved Jokhar account, undisclosed investment in purchase of a machine, unexplained receipts, and concealed sale receipts. The Tribunal also directed the AO to pass fresh assessment orders for certain issues, which the Revenue contested, arguing that the CIT(A) should have decided these issues on merit. The Tribunal admitted the additional grounds raised by the Revenue and restored the issues to the CIT(A) for comprehensive adjudication, ensuring no prejudice to the assessee. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:30:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55019 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions of various additions made by the AO, including those related to unproved Jokhar account, undisclosed investment in purchase of a machine, unexplained receipts, and concealed sale receipts. The Tribunal also directed the AO to pass fresh assessment orders for certain issues, which the Revenue contested, arguing that the CIT(A) should have decided these issues on merit. The Tribunal admitted the additional grounds raised by the Revenue and restored the issues to the CIT(A) for comprehensive adjudication, ensuring no prejudice to the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55019