<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 284 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the discount received from the bank on certificates of deposit is not considered interest or any other similar receipt under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC. Consequently, the discount is included in the profits eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 284 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the discount received from the bank on certificates of deposit is not considered interest or any other similar receipt under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC. Consequently, the discount is included in the profits eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>