<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 267 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in reopening the assessments under Section 148 as the belief of escaped income was based on a misunderstanding of different accounting periods and unverified higher sales figures assessed by the Sales Tax Department. The reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals against the deletions made by the CIT(A) were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 267 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in reopening the assessments under Section 148 as the belief of escaped income was based on a misunderstanding of different accounting periods and unverified higher sales figures assessed by the Sales Tax Department. The reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals against the deletions made by the CIT(A) were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>