<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 597 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802737</link>
    <description>Section 144C makes Dispute Resolution Panel directions binding on the assessing officer and requires the final assessment order to conform to them. An assessment that retains a draft transfer-pricing adjustment contrary to those directions breaches this mandatory requirement and is void from inception. A separate order giving effect to the directions does not cure a final assessment that departs from them, and misunderstanding the objections does not justify non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 08:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 597 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802737</link>
      <description>Section 144C makes Dispute Resolution Panel directions binding on the assessing officer and requires the final assessment order to conform to them. An assessment that retains a draft transfer-pricing adjustment contrary to those directions breaches this mandatory requirement and is void from inception. A separate order giving effect to the directions does not cure a final assessment that departs from them, and misunderstanding the objections does not justify non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>