<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 204 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54994</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the notice under section 158BC and the assessment despite procedural errors. However, it directed the deletion of the addition of undisclosed income for the block period as it was not detected during the search, emphasizing that only income discovered during or as a result of the search could be assessed as undisclosed income under section 158BC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 204 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54994</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the notice under section 158BC and the assessment despite procedural errors. However, it directed the deletion of the addition of undisclosed income for the block period as it was not detected during the search, emphasizing that only income discovered during or as a result of the search could be assessed as undisclosed income under section 158BC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>