<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54985</link>
    <description>The court found the assessment for the block period illegal as it included amounts beyond the specified period. The appeal was allowed, leading to the deletion of additions made for the requisitioned amount and initial investment in speculation business. The court emphasized that assessments should align with the relevant legal provisions and timelines, highlighting the importance of accurate and lawful procedures in determining undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54985</link>
      <description>The court found the assessment for the block period illegal as it included amounts beyond the specified period. The appeal was allowed, leading to the deletion of additions made for the requisitioned amount and initial investment in speculation business. The court emphasized that assessments should align with the relevant legal provisions and timelines, highlighting the importance of accurate and lawful procedures in determining undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>