<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>If this can happen to me, it can happen to any taxpayer in GST. Part 2.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17742</link>
    <description>GST input tax credit (ITC) disputes raise questions about the application of section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act, introduced on 1 January 2022, to a notice covering 2017-18 to 2020-21. The taxpayer argues that the reversal should decrease proportionately if the disputed credit is ineligible, and notes that year-wise workings and relied-upon documents were not furnished. An inadvertent ITC tax-head mismatch raises a separate question: the Kerala High Court&#039;s ruling in Rejimon P Alex is cited for the proposition that such a mismatch does not amount to short payment or non-payment attracting sections 73 or 74. Scrutiny of show-cause notices also requires checking underlying figures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:46:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>If this can happen to me, it can happen to any taxpayer in GST. Part 2.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17742</link>
      <description>GST input tax credit (ITC) disputes raise questions about the application of section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act, introduced on 1 January 2022, to a notice covering 2017-18 to 2020-21. The taxpayer argues that the reversal should decrease proportionately if the disputed credit is ineligible, and notes that year-wise workings and relied-upon documents were not furnished. An inadvertent ITC tax-head mismatch raises a separate question: the Kerala High Court&#039;s ruling in Rejimon P Alex is cited for the proposition that such a mismatch does not amount to short payment or non-payment attracting sections 73 or 74. Scrutiny of show-cause notices also requires checking underlying figures.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:46:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>