<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 559 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802699</link>
    <description>Review under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act cannot be allowed solely because the Supreme Court granted liberty to seek review. Relevant Supreme Court precedents require the Tribunal to determine whether Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies, including where review is sought after an earlier Supreme Court judgment is recalled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 559 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802699</link>
      <description>Review under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act cannot be allowed solely because the Supreme Court granted liberty to seek review. Relevant Supreme Court precedents require the Tribunal to determine whether Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies, including where review is sought after an earlier Supreme Court judgment is recalled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>