<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 275 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54957</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order on the valuation of imported ink cartridges as stock lot, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The goods were classified as stock lot due to being unsold for an extended period and manufactured in 1995 and 1996. The Tribunal supported the declared value and dismissed the appeal for enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:58:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 275 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54957</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order on the valuation of imported ink cartridges as stock lot, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The goods were classified as stock lot due to being unsold for an extended period and manufactured in 1995 and 1996. The Tribunal supported the declared value and dismissed the appeal for enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>