<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 271 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54955</link>
    <description>Waste gas generated during manufacture and supplied free of cost to a neighbouring unit as fuel was held not to be a marketable excisable product. Gas that escaped into the atmosphere was treated by the revenue as non-excisable, and gas used in the manufacturer&#039;s own boiler was also not subjected to duty, leaving only the surplus free-supplied gas in dispute. The Tribunal relied on a Board circular and prior precedent to state that gases arising as by-products or waste do not become excisable merely because they can be used to generate heat. As marketability was not shown, the duty demand and penalties could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 271 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54955</link>
      <description>Waste gas generated during manufacture and supplied free of cost to a neighbouring unit as fuel was held not to be a marketable excisable product. Gas that escaped into the atmosphere was treated by the revenue as non-excisable, and gas used in the manufacturer&#039;s own boiler was also not subjected to duty, leaving only the surplus free-supplied gas in dispute. The Tribunal relied on a Board circular and prior precedent to state that gases arising as by-products or waste do not become excisable merely because they can be used to generate heat. As marketability was not shown, the duty demand and penalties could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>