https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802587 Bid-rigging cartels under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 raise issues of tacit acquiescence and the presumption of appreciable adverse effect on competition. Related issues include the preponderance of probability, the liability of partners and persons in charge under Section 48, and penalties based on individual income. Vacancies in adjudicatory composition and denial of cross-examination also raise questions concerning the adjudicatory process and principles of natural justice. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Nov 2026 08:39:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802587 Bid-rigging cartels under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 raise issues of tacit acquiescence and the presumption of appreciable adverse effect on competition. Related issues include the preponderance of probability, the liability of partners and persons in charge under Section 48, and penalties based on individual income. Vacancies in adjudicatory composition and denial of cross-examination also raise questions concerning the adjudicatory process and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 04 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802587