<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802624</link>
    <description>Non-deposit of input tax credit should be addressed through statutory recovery procedures rather than cancellation of GST registration where returns have been regularly filed. Sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 provide for recovery steps in relation to input tax credit. In these circumstances, cancellation is unjustified and revocation of the registration should be permitted in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802624</link>
      <description>Non-deposit of input tax credit should be addressed through statutory recovery procedures rather than cancellation of GST registration where returns have been regularly filed. Sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 provide for recovery steps in relation to input tax credit. In these circumstances, cancellation is unjustified and revocation of the registration should be permitted in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>