<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 198 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54934</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from balance-sheet entries; affirmative evidence of excess manufacture, unaccounted clearances, or related flow of funds is required, so penalties and confiscation based only on such entries do not survive. Contractual escalation charges are includible in assessable value, but duty must be recomputed on the actual amount received on a cum-duty basis where the department was aware of the arrangement and no suppression or intent to evade is shown. The matter is remanded only for recomputation on escalation charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 198 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54934</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from balance-sheet entries; affirmative evidence of excess manufacture, unaccounted clearances, or related flow of funds is required, so penalties and confiscation based only on such entries do not survive. Contractual escalation charges are includible in assessable value, but duty must be recomputed on the actual amount received on a cum-duty basis where the department was aware of the arrangement and no suppression or intent to evade is shown. The matter is remanded only for recomputation on escalation charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>