<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs penalties for alleged smuggling conspiracy require proof of intent and a connection to the specific import.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105920</link>
    <description>Customs penalties for alleged abetment of betel nut smuggling through a conspiracy require proof of mens rea and a connection with the particular import; alleged financing alone does not establish the offence. Evidence concerning another importer requires a link to the disputed consignment. Retracted inculpatory statements and the absence of cross-examination of co-noticees affect the evidential basis, with cross-examination recognised under section 138B. Under section 138C, recovery of a certificate from a Customs broker&#039;s computer raises a presumption of the broker&#039;s possession and ownership. Beneficial ownership was not covered by the definition of importer applicable to the import.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs penalties for alleged smuggling conspiracy require proof of intent and a connection to the specific import.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105920</link>
      <description>Customs penalties for alleged abetment of betel nut smuggling through a conspiracy require proof of mens rea and a connection with the particular import; alleged financing alone does not establish the offence. Evidence concerning another importer requires a link to the disputed consignment. Retracted inculpatory statements and the absence of cross-examination of co-noticees affect the evidential basis, with cross-examination recognised under section 138B. Under section 138C, recovery of a certificate from a Customs broker&#039;s computer raises a presumption of the broker&#039;s possession and ownership. Beneficial ownership was not covered by the definition of importer applicable to the import.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>