<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gold smuggling allegations demand timely reasonable belief for reverse burden, admissible statements and evidence beyond travel records.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105919</link>
    <description>Reasonable belief based on material available at seizure is required before the reverse burden under Section 123 applies to allegedly smuggled gold; later statements cannot supply that foundation. Conclusive proof of smuggling is not required at seizure. Customs statements require examination of their makers, an admissibility determination and requested cross-examination unless a statutory exception applies; retraction alone does not make them inadmissible. Travel records alone do not establish that gold was carried, its quantity or its smuggled character; each link requires evidence. A penalty under Section 114AA requires reliable proof that a person knowingly or intentionally made, signed or used a false or incorrect declaration, statement or document in the circumstances covered by the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gold smuggling allegations demand timely reasonable belief for reverse burden, admissible statements and evidence beyond travel records.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105919</link>
      <description>Reasonable belief based on material available at seizure is required before the reverse burden under Section 123 applies to allegedly smuggled gold; later statements cannot supply that foundation. Conclusive proof of smuggling is not required at seizure. Customs statements require examination of their makers, an admissibility determination and requested cross-examination unless a statutory exception applies; retraction alone does not make them inadmissible. Travel records alone do not establish that gold was carried, its quantity or its smuggled character; each link requires evidence. A penalty under Section 114AA requires reliable proof that a person knowingly or intentionally made, signed or used a false or incorrect declaration, statement or document in the circumstances covered by the provision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:12:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>