<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802545</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is confined to obvious and patent mistakes apparent from the record. It does not permit review of an earlier decision or correction of an alleged error that requires prolonged reasoning on a debatable point. An application seeking reconsideration without identifying an apparent mistake does not warrant rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 08:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=934034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802545</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is confined to obvious and patent mistakes apparent from the record. It does not permit review of an earlier decision or correction of an alleged error that requires prolonged reasoning on a debatable point. An application seeking reconsideration without identifying an apparent mistake does not warrant rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>