<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2485 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473182</link>
    <description>Section 263 permits revision of an assessment that is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, including where an issue requiring verification was assessed without inquiry or application of mind. A non-speaking assessment and the absence of a specific inquiry into expenditure attributable to exempt income can warrant fresh examination under section 14A. Satisfaction about the correctness of the expenditure claim requires examination of the accounts before Rule 8D is applied. A proposed rectification that does not proceed after objections does not, by itself, establish that the revisional authority acted on borrowed satisfaction. Re-examination may be directed without finally determining a disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 13:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2485 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473182</link>
      <description>Section 263 permits revision of an assessment that is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, including where an issue requiring verification was assessed without inquiry or application of mind. A non-speaking assessment and the absence of a specific inquiry into expenditure attributable to exempt income can warrant fresh examination under section 14A. Satisfaction about the correctness of the expenditure claim requires examination of the accounts before Rule 8D is applied. A proposed rectification that does not proceed after objections does not, by itself, establish that the revisional authority acted on borrowed satisfaction. Re-examination may be directed without finally determining a disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>