<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2486 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473183</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in two bank accounts were treated as unexplained income because the accounts were considered undisclosed in the return. The return produced at the hearing showed that both accounts had been disclosed, while the record supported the assessee&#039;s work as a Bank Mitra. The addition of the deposits as unexplained income was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 13:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2486 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473183</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in two bank accounts were treated as unexplained income because the accounts were considered undisclosed in the return. The return produced at the hearing showed that both accounts had been disclosed, while the record supported the assessee&#039;s work as a Bank Mitra. The addition of the deposits as unexplained income was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>