<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation but reduced the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant for pre-dating a Bill of Lading to avoid possession conditions for importing a second-hand car. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s circumstances, including demurrage costs and the vehicle&#039;s condition, and ordered the release of the car upon payment of reduced fines and applicable duties to alleviate the financial burden on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation but reduced the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant for pre-dating a Bill of Lading to avoid possession conditions for importing a second-hand car. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s circumstances, including demurrage costs and the vehicle&#039;s condition, and ordered the release of the car upon payment of reduced fines and applicable duties to alleviate the financial burden on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>