<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 338 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802478</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing information is not sustainable where the taxpayer substantially complies with prescribed requirements and unavailable third-party information falls outside those obligations. The penalty applies to documents or information prescribed under Rule 10D and requisitioned under section 92D. Furnishing the valuation report, transfer pricing documentation and other available material may constitute substantial compliance. Additional information may be sought directly from the third party or valuer. Acceptance of the valuation in quantum proceedings further undermines the alleged basis for non-furnishing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 08:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 338 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802478</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing information is not sustainable where the taxpayer substantially complies with prescribed requirements and unavailable third-party information falls outside those obligations. The penalty applies to documents or information prescribed under Rule 10D and requisitioned under section 92D. Furnishing the valuation report, transfer pricing documentation and other available material may constitute substantial compliance. Additional information may be sought directly from the third party or valuer. Acceptance of the valuation in quantum proceedings further undermines the alleged basis for non-furnishing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>