<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802485</link>
    <description>Where a return filed after a reassessment notice is accepted, failure to issue a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) invalidates the assessment. A best judgment assessment based on non-compliance is unjustified where the assessment record contains the taxpayer&#039;s response and supporting records. Accepted agricultural income and documented cash withdrawals may explain alleged unexplained money and bank credits, respectively, preventing the corresponding additions from surviving.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 08:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802485</link>
      <description>Where a return filed after a reassessment notice is accepted, failure to issue a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) invalidates the assessment. A best judgment assessment based on non-compliance is unjustified where the assessment record contains the taxpayer&#039;s response and supporting records. Accepted agricultural income and documented cash withdrawals may explain alleged unexplained money and bank credits, respectively, preventing the corresponding additions from surviving.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>