<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 226 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802366</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit available on imported inputs is excluded from input cost when determining the excise assessable value of railway track maintenance machines. The credit benefit was transferred through an endorsement in a letter attached to the bill of entry, and certificates addressed the non-passing of duty incidence to the buyer. The manufacturer was entitled to a refund of excess excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 226 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802366</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit available on imported inputs is excluded from input cost when determining the excise assessable value of railway track maintenance machines. The credit benefit was transferred through an endorsement in a letter attached to the bill of entry, and certificates addressed the non-passing of duty incidence to the buyer. The manufacturer was entitled to a refund of excess excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>