<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 227 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802367</link>
    <description>Target-based incentives, discounts and customer-scheme reimbursements linked to principal-to-principal sales are not consideration for a declared service where no independent service is identified. Transfers of title by sale fall outside the definition of service, and trading in goods is on the negative list. Sales targets, best-efforts obligations and implementation of customer discounts do not themselves establish a separate service for the manufacturer. The extended limitation period cannot be invoked without evidence of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression or intent to evade; mere non-payment of disputed tax does not establish suppression with intent to evade.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 227 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802367</link>
      <description>Target-based incentives, discounts and customer-scheme reimbursements linked to principal-to-principal sales are not consideration for a declared service where no independent service is identified. Transfers of title by sale fall outside the definition of service, and trading in goods is on the negative list. Sales targets, best-efforts obligations and implementation of customer discounts do not themselves establish a separate service for the manufacturer. The extended limitation period cannot be invoked without evidence of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression or intent to evade; mere non-payment of disputed tax does not establish suppression with intent to evade.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>