https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802374 Complainant participation in an insolvency professional's disciplinary appeal is not mandatory. A complainant should not be impleaded against their wishes merely because of subsequently discovered facts, unless their presence is required for just disposal. Replacement of an authorised representative operates prospectively and does not invalidate acts validly performed during the predecessor's tenure. Where a complaint has been found maintainable and disciplinary proceedings have culminated in an order, subsequent material cannot be used to reopen the complainant's standing. The disciplinary order's correctness is assessed on the material before the disciplinary committee. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802374 Complainant participation in an insolvency professional's disciplinary appeal is not mandatory. A complainant should not be impleaded against their wishes merely because of subsequently discovered facts, unless their presence is required for just disposal. Replacement of an authorised representative operates prospectively and does not invalidate acts validly performed during the predecessor's tenure. Where a complaint has been found maintainable and disciplinary proceedings have culminated in an order, subsequent material cannot be used to reopen the complainant's standing. The disciplinary order's correctness is assessed on the material before the disciplinary committee. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 30 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802374