https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802375 Condonation of delay in seeking recall of an ex parte order may be refused where the explanation lacks credible support and does not establish reasonable diligence. Article 122 of the Limitation Act prescribes a 30-day period from dismissal rather than knowledge. An explanation attributing delay to former counsel requires credible supporting material; the absence of a no-objection from counsel, as contemplated by Order III Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, may also be relevant. The time-bound nature of insolvency proceedings is relevant to condonation. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802375 Condonation of delay in seeking recall of an ex parte order may be refused where the explanation lacks credible support and does not establish reasonable diligence. Article 122 of the Limitation Act prescribes a 30-day period from dismissal rather than knowledge. An explanation attributing delay to former counsel requires credible supporting material; the absence of a no-objection from counsel, as contemplated by Order III Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, may also be relevant. The time-bound nature of insolvency proceedings is relevant to condonation. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802375