<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 243 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802383</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction and condonation of delay raise the question whether an Appellate Tribunal may grant relief solely on the basis of liberty granted by the Supreme Court without determining whether the bar in the Explanation to Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies. Related issues include the binding effect of earlier coordinate and larger Bench decisions and the prospective application of substantive amendments to penal or confiscatory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 243 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802383</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction and condonation of delay raise the question whether an Appellate Tribunal may grant relief solely on the basis of liberty granted by the Supreme Court without determining whether the bar in the Explanation to Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies. Related issues include the binding effect of earlier coordinate and larger Bench decisions and the prospective application of substantive amendments to penal or confiscatory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>