https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802410 Financial hardship raised by an applicant must be considered before an appellate authority rejects a stay application solely for non-payment of a stipulated deposit. Where the required deposit is 20% of the demand, rejection without considering the asserted hardship is unsustainable and requires fresh consideration of the stay application. The underlying statutory appeal remains pending. en-us Thu, 29 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:44:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802410 Financial hardship raised by an applicant must be considered before an appellate authority rejects a stay application solely for non-payment of a stipulated deposit. Where the required deposit is 20% of the demand, rejection without considering the asserted hardship is unsustainable and requires fresh consideration of the stay application. The underlying statutory appeal remains pending. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802410