<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 290 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802430</link>
    <description>Natural justice may be breached where a taxpayer is not given an opportunity to produce relevant business records identified for verification before assessment, even if personal hearings have been held. Setting aside the assessment is conditional on depositing 10% of the disputed tax within six weeks. Consequential actions, including bank attachment, are revoked, and the period from the assessment order to receipt of the order is excluded for limitation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 290 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802430</link>
      <description>Natural justice may be breached where a taxpayer is not given an opportunity to produce relevant business records identified for verification before assessment, even if personal hearings have been held. Setting aside the assessment is conditional on depositing 10% of the disputed tax within six weeks. Consequential actions, including bank attachment, are revoked, and the period from the assessment order to receipt of the order is excluded for limitation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>