https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54887 The appellate tribunal confirmed duty liability against the appellants for goods lacking Central Excise documents. The goods were dispatched without payment of duty, leading to a duty confirmation of Rs. 94,961/-. Confiscation of seized goods was set aside due to lack of specific notice. The penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was reduced to Rs. 50,000/- based on case circumstances. The appeal was mostly rejected, except for the penalty reduction and confiscation setting aside. Judgment was delivered by Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (J) of the CESTAT, Mumbai, on 1-7-2005. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54887 The appellate tribunal confirmed duty liability against the appellants for goods lacking Central Excise documents. The goods were dispatched without payment of duty, leading to a duty confirmation of Rs. 94,961/-. Confiscation of seized goods was set aside due to lack of specific notice. The penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was reduced to Rs. 50,000/- based on case circumstances. The appeal was mostly rejected, except for the penalty reduction and confiscation setting aside. Judgment was delivered by Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (J) of the CESTAT, Mumbai, on 1-7-2005. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54887