<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 204 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54874</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants due to their acquittal by the criminal court on the same facts and evidence. The tribunal found the confiscation of the vessel unsustainable, as there was no evidence of knowledge of smuggling by the company or its agents. The penalties were annulled, recognizing the criminal court&#039;s acquittal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 204 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54874</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants due to their acquittal by the criminal court on the same facts and evidence. The tribunal found the confiscation of the vessel unsustainable, as there was no evidence of knowledge of smuggling by the company or its agents. The penalties were annulled, recognizing the criminal court&#039;s acquittal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>