<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 187 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802327</link>
    <description>Misdescribing a revised draft assessment order as a draft assessment order does not warrant review as an error apparent when the undisputed basis of the decision remains unchanged. Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required a revised draft assessment order before the final assessment. An earlier draft had been issued, but no revised draft was passed; the misdescription therefore did not justify review of the order quashing the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2026 08:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 187 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802327</link>
      <description>Misdescribing a revised draft assessment order as a draft assessment order does not warrant review as an error apparent when the undisputed basis of the decision remains unchanged. Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required a revised draft assessment order before the final assessment. An earlier draft had been issued, but no revised draft was passed; the misdescription therefore did not justify review of the order quashing the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>