<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54866</link>
    <description>Programming imported pagers in the factory, together with labelling and packing, was treated as manufacture because the goods were not usable as pagers without that process under the relevant chapter note. The duty demand was sustained on that basis. On valuation, the clearance value was held to fall within the settled cum-duty pricing principle, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. On penalties, the main penalty was reduced, and the personal penalties on the Director and General Manager were set aside because there was no evidence of deliberate omission or intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54866</link>
      <description>Programming imported pagers in the factory, together with labelling and packing, was treated as manufacture because the goods were not usable as pagers without that process under the relevant chapter note. The duty demand was sustained on that basis. On valuation, the clearance value was held to fall within the settled cum-duty pricing principle, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. On penalties, the main penalty was reduced, and the personal penalties on the Director and General Manager were set aside because there was no evidence of deliberate omission or intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>