<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported machinery, citing the Apex Court&#039;s judgment in LML Limited. The Tribunal found that the SAD was applicable despite being introduced after the import of goods, as the taxable event for customs duty occurs upon goods clearance. Relying on legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal rejected the appeal and reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, aligning with the Apex Court&#039;s interpretation of customs duty events.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported machinery, citing the Apex Court&#039;s judgment in LML Limited. The Tribunal found that the SAD was applicable despite being introduced after the import of goods, as the taxable event for customs duty occurs upon goods clearance. Relying on legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal rejected the appeal and reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, aligning with the Apex Court&#039;s interpretation of customs duty events.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>